A fine of KRW 3,00,000 shall be imposed on the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, and a fine of KRW 3,00,000 shall be imposed on the crime No. 2 in the judgment of the court.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties at the Gangnam District Court Branch Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 8, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Gangnam Prison on June 30, 2017.

On November 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on February 1, 2016 at the Ansan Prison on November 6, 2016.

[Criminal facts] No person shall repeatedly reach another person in the form of code, text, sound, image, or picture that arouses fear or apprehension.

1. Nevertheless, on July 8, 2016, the Defendant: (a) used the Defendant’s mobile phone (C) around August 12, 2016 on the ground that the Defendant was not subject to this contact from the victim B (V, 27 years of age) who was in a former relationship; and (b) used the Defendant’s mobile phone (C) around August 12, 2016, to see that the Defendant “A flap is difficult to flap but flap. flap.

Now, send a text message stating, “I am feas, I am feas, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

On July 27, 2016, from around 22:18 on July 27, 2016 to around 01:48 on August 12, 2016, the victim sent repeatedly a text message causing fear or apprehensions to the victim 13 times in total, such as (i) the list of crimes in attached Form 1.

2. On September 4, 2017, the Defendant, at around September 16:27, 2017, withdrawn 300,000 won from Dsanbu and sideat machinery on January 3, 2014 to 300,000 won from the 5.60,000 won flag, which was included in nutrition, and tried to make a flag at the flag with a low-flag, which was to be taken after the operation, and to make the same flag at the flag, which was recorded at the hospital’s prescription on January 3, 2017, when examining the witness of this trial, the Defendant conducted a flag with the flag flag operated by the flag on the flag.