logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2015.08.20 2013가합996
종중총회결의 무효확인
Text

1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties, etc. (1) The defendant is a clan that jointly sets up the Z of the 13-year-old X Y's lineal ascendant and descendant, and the plaintiffs are the clan members of the defendant's clan.

(2) The affiliation of the defendant clan includes U, A, AB, AC, AD, AE, and AF.

B. A resolution of each general assembly of the defendant clan (1) on March 18, 2012, the defendant clan held an extraordinary general meeting to revise the rules of the defendant. The defendant clan, the president of H and vice-president, appointed the J, K, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, J, R, RS, and general secretary as the president, the president of H and vice-president, and delegated the right to claim the payment of deposit money to the officers of the branch, and delegated the right to claim the payment of deposit money to the officers of the branch, and delegated the board of directors for the restoration of the property owned by the clan to the original state and for the lawsuit for compensation for damages

(2) The defendant clan held a special general meeting on November 18, 2012, and subsequently amended the rules of the defendant, appointed K as H and Vice-Chairperson as I and auditor by the defendant's president, 7-15 directors are to be appointed by the above H, and the 7-15 directors are to be delegated to the officers newly elected for the exercise of the right to pay deposit money, and the board of directors is entrusted with the restoration of the property owned by the clan to its original state and the lawsuit seeking compensation for damages, and the details thereof shall be delegated to the board of directors for the restoration of the property owned by the clan and the lawsuit seeking compensation for damages, and confirmed the act done by H as the defendant's representative after the first resolution.

(hereinafter “Secondary Resolution”). (3) On November 7, 2013, the Defendant clan lent funds to V from 2006 to January 10, 2010 at the ordinary meeting of the general meeting of the shareholders, and confirmed that the letter of monetary contract agreement has been made. The Defendant clan made a resolution on the rejection of an objection against the deposit transfer tax and passed a resolution on other civil, criminal procedure and institution through the board of directors’ meetings.

(hereinafter referred to as the "third resolution"). (4) On the other hand, the defendant clans of this case.

arrow