1. Of the distribution schedule prepared on December 5, 2014 by the said court with respect to the distribution procedure case of Suwon District Court Sejong Housing Site C.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant A is an internal director of Company D (hereinafter “D”) from March 24, 2011 to September 30, 2011, and from March 28, 2013 to March 28, 2013, and Defendant B is a person registered respectively as a director of D from March 24, 2011 to March 24, 201.

B. On September 3, 2013, with respect to D, the Seoul Central District Court rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures by 2013 Gohap139, and on December 5, 2013, the decision to discontinue rehabilitation procedures became final and conclusive.

On December 5, 2013, the sum of wages and retirement allowances in arrears from November 1, 2012 to September 2013, 2013 among the wages in arrears and retirement allowances in December 10, 2013, Defendant A 60,495,891 on December 10, 2013, on the date when the decision was reached with respect to the third debtor of the case number (U.S. District Court) (the number of the creditors’ claim amount) (the total amount of wages in arrears and retirement allowances in arrears from November 2012 to September 2013 is 52,852,290 won (Evidence 1).

The "52,852,010 won" stated as the recipient among the evidence Nos. 1 appears to be a mistake in calculation.

On January 14, 2014, Defendant B 9,091, 446, February 5, 2014, 2014, on January 201, 2014, Defendant B 9,091, 446, and February 5, 2014, on February 11, 2014, Plaintiff B and UA technology 585, 595, 600, March 24, 2014, and March 2014, 2014, respectively.

The Plaintiffs and the Defendants, as indicated below, were subject to the order of seizure and collection as to each claim against the damage insurance company of ELA (hereinafter “damage insurance company of ELA”), with respect to the claims owned by ELA as to each claim.

Provided, That the plaintiff bank was determined to seize and collect the provisional seizure by transferring the provisional seizure to the original seizure.

The total amount of each claim stated in the table shall be the total amount of each claim in the table.

The Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., on June 9, 2014, at the Suwon District Court No. 2014No. 1526 on the ground of competition between seizure and attachment.

The amount of seized claim 198,592,241 won was deposited and reported on the reason of deposit at that time.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant deposit”). The amount to be distributed actually: Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant B, the Plaintiff of the Plaintiff Company, and Defendant B, the Plaintiff of the Plaintiff Company, Defendant B, the Plaintiff of the Plaintiff of the Plaintiff Company, 198,85,349,00 KRW 58,748,070,7709,317,735 1,080,080,079,9775,595,601,747,747,821,773,71, and 112222.