Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 02:10 on September 29, 2019, around 02:0, 02:10, at the soup and soup bank of the 8th floor C building in Osan City, the victim took time together with the victim A, and the victim took time against the victim tightly, the victim’s face and body part can be taken off by drinking, the victim’s face and body part can be taken off by drinking, the victim’s shoulder is cut back by drinking, and the victim’s shoulder is cut back once by drinking, and the victim’s shoulder is sent from the victim’s “breath” at the entrance and entrance of the same day at around 02:20 on the same day while waiting with the victim, while waiting for the police, at two times the victim’s bucks of the victim, and caused the victim’s injury to the victim, such as the number of days of treatment, and the tension and tension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (whether an injury A is recognized as a fact);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order (Defendant B);

1. The scope of recommendation [decision of types] according to the sentencing guidelines and the scope of general injury [Type 1] general injury (including a special person who has made efforts to recover damage], and factors for mitigation of punishment (including a serious effort to recover damage) or considerable damage therefrom (the area of recommendation and the scope of recommendation) and the area of mitigation of punishment, two months to October;

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant had a very same criminal record, the fact that the criminal record is not good, etc., which is unfavorable to the Defendant, on the other hand, the fact that the Defendant recognized and reflects the crime, that there is an agreement with the victim, and that there are some other circumstances to consider the circumstances of the case, etc., respectively, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and taking into account all other factors included in the records of the instant case

Public prosecution rejection part (Defendant A)

1. The Defendant’s summary of the facts charged is Osan City around September 29, 2019.