1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.

The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the first floor B01 of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the first floor B01, and the Defendant is the owner of the first floor 101 of the loan of this case (hereinafter “the first floor”). around January 2015, the water leakage of the instant loan of this case (hereinafter “the first unit”) occurred. Accordingly, the phenomenon, such as ice, color, mathing, and mathing on the wall, floor, etc. around January 29, 2015, the Plaintiff was notified of the first unit of water of this case from the Plaintiff, and the Defendant paid KRW 1,00,000,000 to E operating the enterprise of “D” for water leakage diagnosis and waterproof construction expenses, and transferred KRW 30,000,000 to the Plaintiff’s account on March 16, 2015 each of the Plaintiff’s account with the Plaintiff’s fee of KRW 1,00,000,000 for KRW 30,010.

Since April 2017, 201, 'the second leakage below 'the second leakage' of the loan of this case around 201.

(ii)The occurrence has occurred and, accordingly, there have been phenomena, such as ice, color, mathal, mathal, etc., primarily in the benda and the wall of the benda and Shasta, etc. (based on recognition). [In the absence of any dispute, Gap 1 through 6, 18, 19 (each description and image including Ga number, each description and image of Eul 1 through 6, and the purport of the entire pleadings, images and the whole purport of arguments.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) The first and second water leakages of this case were caused by the problems of piping pipes, which are exclusive areas of 101, (the first and second water leakages of this case), and the second water leakages of this case were incurred by the Plaintiff in the remote area No. 201 of the loan of this case, the cost of replacing the phone board, the cost of repairing the ceiling, the cost of replacing the paint, the cost of replacing the paint color, the cost of cleaning the electric light, and the cost of cleaning the toilet, etc., but the additional cost of repairing damages is expected to be paid to the toilet, etc.

(2) Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages arising from the number of the first and second instances of this case, and the Defendant is liable to compensate the damages arising from the first and second leakages of this case.