logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.01 2017나8110
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following reasons. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] - Part written in the judgment of the court of first instance - " January 7, 2016" in Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed " January 6, 2016".

- Part 4 of the first instance judgment, “The Plaintiff appealed against the above judgment, but the said court dismissed the appeal on February 9, 2017 (Seoul Central District Court 2016No3615), and the judgment dismissing the appeal on April 7, 2017 (Supreme Court 2017Do3166)” in Part 3, which read “The Plaintiff appealed against the above judgment, but was sentenced to a dismissal of the appeal on April 7, 2017 (Supreme Court 2017Do3166).”

- On the 8th judgment of the first instance court, the 19th judgment is being pending in the appellate trial, and the 19th judgment becomes final and conclusive.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow