beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 18:00 on the lower end of October 2013, 2013, based on the gaps in the victim D management “E” located in Yansan-si C of the Jeonsi-si, the victim’s market price, which was displayed in front of the store, was 60,000 won of the market price of the victim’s possession, and stolen it.
2. On November 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) concealed and stolen the Defendant’s instant cargo 1 on the first day of November 2013, 15:00 - around 16:00 on the first day of November 2013, 16:0; (b) in the store of the Victim Home Packer Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “The Home Packer Stacker Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “The Home Packer Stacker”), which was displayed at the store, using a creb in which employees’ surveillance was neglected; and (c) was displayed at the store, the victim’s market price of KRW 79,900, an amount of KRW 79,900, an amount of KRW 29,000 on the first day of the first day of the year; and (d) was 100,000.
3. On November 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) went to and stolen the Victim G G management “H,” which was displayed in front of the store, using the gaps in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected; (b) around 15:00 on the first day of the mid-term, mid-term, 2013, at the victim G management “H” store located in YY-gu, Y-si, Y-si; and (c) committed a theft with one set of 58,00 U.S. T
4. On November 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at around 16:00 on the first day of the mid-term 2013, the Defendant: (b) took a 119,000 Won of the market price, which was displayed in front of the store, using a gap in the victim J’s supervision in the front of the store, and stolen the Defendant, with one set of 119,000 won of the market price, which was displayed in front of the store by taking advantage of the gap in the victim J’s supervision in the front of the store.
5. On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant was a victim’s owner who was displayed at a new display site using the gap in which employees’ surveillance was neglected from the second floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2013.