logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.09.25 2017고단2103
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 9, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 23:45 around Ulsan-gu, and the head of the Jung-gu, Seoul-gu, and the head of the Dong-gu, and the head of the Dong-gu, in front of the public health clinic, 225, laid a pedago on the B-si and the head of the Dong-gu, the Defendant, upon receiving 112 report and received a request from the police officer belonging to the police station of the Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, who was in receipt of the report and received an identification request from the police officer of the police station of the Ulsan-gu, who was in receipt of the report,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (referring to the part favorable to the following reasons for sentencing)

1. The basic area (from June to June 1) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommended punishment] and the basic area (from June to June) of the sentencing criteria (the person who has any special sentencing factors) shall interfere with the performance of official duties;

2. Based on the above sentencing criteria, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in full view of the following factors, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, and motive of crime:

A favorable circumstances: A confession and reflects in depth, and there are no previous convictions of the same kind, and other previous convictions of the fine of 2002, only one time before the fine of 202.

1. Unfavorable circumstances: Offenses are inferior, such as exercising direct tangible power on police officers who perform legitimate public duties.

arrow