Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants, two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 5, 2016, Defendant A operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “F” from around 22:30 Spocheon-si E and 2, around 2016, Defendant A arranged sexual traffic for the business of having shower facilities and a lock-up room equipped with a lock-up room, and guiding an unspecified male guest who found a business establishment, to receive 120,000 won of sexual traffic price from an unspecified male guest, and allowing female employee to engage in sexual traffic with the male guest and the female employee.

2. Although Defendant B knew that he/she would operate the said commercial sex acts establishments, he/she concluded a lease agreement with Defendant B, setting a lessee A, a deposit of KRW 5 million, and monthly rent of KRW 800,000,000, around April 18:30, 2016, with respect to the “F” businesses owned by the Defendant, either of the following:

Accordingly, the defendant provided a place of sexual traffic to arrange sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Each statement of G, H and I;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant B;

1. A copy of the investigation report (control details, etc.), investigation report (related to the entry into the building B), copy of the internal investigation report, and a copy of the notification;

1. A copy of a real estate lease agreement;

1. Application of statutes governing field enforcement photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Articles 19(2)1(generally) and 19(2)1(a) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts; and

B. Defendant B: Articles 19(1)1 and 2(1)2(c) (including inclusive) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, and choice of imprisonment;

1. Defendants: Determination of the assertion of Defendant B and the defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant B’s defense counsel withdraws the previous assertion of acquittal from his written opinion on March 7, 2017, which was submitted after the conclusion of the instant pleadings, and recognized all the facts charged in the instant case.

1. Defendant B’s summary of the assertion is at the District Court of the Speaker on January 16, 2017.