1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: Fact that there is no dispute, each entry in Gap's evidence 1 through 7, and purport of the whole pleadings);

A. The Defendants were awarded a contract for a new construction of a detached house from the Plaintiff’s mother D, and there was a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff regarding the amount of construction cost during the said construction.

B. At around 10:30 on May 30, 2017, the Defendants found the Plaintiff’s work at E post Office, and among the employees of the post office, Defendant B insultd the Plaintiff, stating that “The Defendant B, “Is the instant post office, Is the instant post office, Is the instant post office, Is the knife, Is the knife, Is the knife, Is the knife, knife, Is the knife, Is the knife, Is the Plaintiff.”

C. The Defendants find again at the above post office around 18:00 on May 30, 2017. Defendant B saw the Plaintiff’s bat, batd the Plaintiff’s bat, twice the Plaintiff’s batch, and Defendant C also batd the Plaintiff’s batch, and suffered injury, such as the bating of the bats necessary for the Plaintiff’s treatment for about three weeks.

Based on the above insult and bodily injury, Defendant B received a summary order of KRW 2 million for the offense of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and a fine of KRW 300,000 for the offense of insult, and Defendant C received a summary order of KRW 300,000 for the offense of insult.

[Defendant C is the first offender for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and is subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment on the grounds that the participatory information is relatively minor). 2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants should jointly pay 10,000,000 won for consolation money to the Plaintiff.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are obligated to compensate the plaintiff for mental damage suffered by the plaintiff as a joint tortfeasor who assaults and insultd the plaintiff. The above facts of recognition and the whole purport of oral argument can be seen as the whole through the fact and macroscopic evidence, the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants, and the reasons for the assault and insult.