A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 25, 2014, the Defendant prepared a written complaint on D and E (the Defendant’s name “F” in the complaint) from the Defendant’s office located in Jung-gu Seoul Central District Office C and 205 on September 25, 2014. On September 26, 2014, the Defendant submitted the above written complaint to a public official in poor name of the Seoul Central District Police Station located in Jung-gu Seoul Central District Police Station 2, Jung-gu, Seoul.

The contents of the written complaint were as follows: “Unless the complainant did not assault the employee F at the main points operated by D in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 24, 2014, the complainant would induce D employee F to report, thereby making the complainant as the perpetrator, and F would be punished as a crime of false accusation by a person who was punished as a person who was punished by a fine on the ground that the complainant committed an assault on the part of the complainant.”

However, on May 24, 2014, the Defendant assaulted E at the H main point operated by D in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a drinking value problem, and at the same time, at the right face of E, an employee, as a drinking house, three times. D and E did not know the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false complaint with D and E for the purpose of criminal punishment against D and E, and brought the complaint against D and E respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence records, 55, 89 pages);

1. Relevant Article 156 of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendations] Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act that there is no basic field (6-2 years) (6-2 years) (the special person) of sentencing [the decision of sentence] of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the fact that a defendant's complaint is false is recognized as false, and the complaint is withdrawn, there is no history of the same crime,