The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake, the identity of the defendant and the confusion caused by the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant shows a strong attitude that he would no longer inhale toxic chemicals. However, the defendant has already been subject to criminal punishment several times as in this case. In particular, on February 2, 2012, he was sentenced 8 months to imprisonment for the crime of inhaleing hallucinogenic substances on August 22, 2012, and was sentenced to the punishment for the same crime immediately after completion of the execution of the punishment, and was first sentenced to a fine for the same crime, and again committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, without care, again committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, even though he was subject to hospital treatment several times to inhale hallucinogenic substances, it is difficult to take into account the circumstances that the defendant had committed the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case and the circumstances that the court below committed the crime of this case, as well as the circumstances and records.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.