Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
According to Article 3 of the Trial of Small Claims Act, with respect to small claims, an appeal may be filed only when the judgment on whether or not the violation of the law, rules of order or disposition, or the law of order or disposition is unfair, or when the judgment contrary to the Supreme Court's precedents
Here, “when the Supreme Court rendered a decision contrary to the Supreme Court’s precedents” refers to a case where the Supreme Court’s decision is made on the application of the statutory provisions applicable to a specific case to the relevant case, which are subject to the definition interpretation through a trial of the Supreme Court, or on the premise of the opposite interpretation contents, to the relevant case.
(2) The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff made a decision contrary to the Supreme Court precedents (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da53078, Oct. 13, 2006). However, although the Plaintiff asserted that the lower court made a decision contrary to the Supreme Court precedents, the lower court cannot be deemed to have made a decision contrary to the Supreme Court precedents, since the specific matters alleged by the Defendant are not identical to the instant case, and there is no room for
In addition, the remaining grounds of appeal do not constitute legitimate grounds of appeal as provided by the Trial of Small Claims Act.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.