1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

(2) Around August 13, 2016, the Plaintiff was requested from the Defendant for the estimation of the light-scale construction project in Fdong and G Dong, and submitted a quotation accordingly.

around that time, the defendant seems to have affixed a corporate seal in the above written estimate.

(A) Following the increase in the construction volume and the Defendant’s payment of part of the materials to the Plaintiff, the Defendant demanded another quotation to the Plaintiff.

On August 22, 2016, around August 29, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted a written estimate to the Defendant that reduce the unit price for estimate on two occasions.

The F-dong unit price (cost of materials and construction cost per square meter) in such a estimate is indicated in the following table:

On August 13, 2016, on August 22, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) on August 22, 2016, 2016, the lower court: (b) on August 29, 2016, the lower court: (c) on 2 double pages - - 222,00 won - 17,500 won - 9.50 won - 29,500 won 29,500 won - 29,500 won - 20,000 won - 19,000 won - 19,000 won - 14,500 won - 20,000 won - 20,000 won - 19,000 won - 30,000 won - 16,000 won - 28,000 won - 18,201.20

(including additional construction; hereinafter referred to as “instant construction”). (b)

The Plaintiff received a total of KRW 170,000,000 from the Defendant until November 1, 2016.

C. (1) The instant construction cost stated in the appraisal result with respect to the appraisal result with respect to the appraiser M is KRW 244,853,00,000. 2) According to the appraisal entrustment with respect to the appraiser M at the party, the construction cost calculated based on the output number (593) presented by the Defendant, and the unit price for material purchase is KRW 188,970,000.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 2, 3, 5, 10, 14 through 16, and Eul.