Defendant

B The Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, and a fine of KRW 700,000, respectively.

Defendant

B and C, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B was a director of the FF Agricultural Cooperative (hereinafter referred to as the “FFFFFFFFC”) in Changwon-si E, and Defendant C was the head of the general affairs team of the FFFFC.

On November 9, 2012, the General Assembly of the FFF Temporary Representatives passed a six-month disciplinary resolution of suspension from office on the ground of occupational breach of trust against G on November 9, 2012, G was suspended from duties on November 12, 2012.

As a result, G filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation or revocation of the absence of the resolution of the general meeting of delegates as Msan-Support 2012Kahap2774 against the FFFFFFF under the Changwon District Court M&D 2012Kahap178 (hereinafter “Masan-Support”), and the application for provisional disposition was accepted on January 15, 2013.

However, on April 11, 2014, the Mountainous District Court rendered a decision to dismiss all G claims in the lawsuit on the merits, such as nullification of the absence of the resolution of the representative general meeting of councillors, which was brought by G, and accordingly, rendered a decision to revoke the provisional disposition of suspension of the above effect in the case of Msan-Support 2014Kahap11 on April 24, 2014 and dismiss the application for provisional disposition of suspension of the above effect. The above decision was served on G on April 29, 2014.

Accordingly, the auditor H of the FFC convened an emergency board of directors for the appointment of an acting director of the partnership on April 29, 2014 and appointed I as an acting director of the partnership at the open board of directors on April 30, 2014.

On April 30, 2014, I notified the victim J, who was general free of charge, to the guest room of the first floor credit counter of the head office, and notified the FFFFFFF employees of the letter of personnel assignment (on May 2, 2014).

Since then, G was unable to work as the head of the five-story association, and the victim who was ordered as the head of the first floor was also unable to work for the five-story general affairs of the transfer department.

Nevertheless, when G and the victim attend school, Defendant C and B did the following acts for the purpose of preventing them from doing so.

1. Defendant C is the Defendant C on January 2014.