Text
Defendant
In the case of crimes No. 1 and No. 4 in the judgment of EV, six years of imprisonment, and fines of KRW 3,00,000 for crimes No. 3 in the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
To the extent that it does not substantially impede the exercise of the accused’s right to defense, the facts charged are partially revised and recognized as criminal facts without any changes in indictment.
[2] Defendant EV was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) at the Gwangju District Court on August 13, 2015 and the judgment on August 21, 2015 became final and conclusive. On October 29, 2015, Defendant EV was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the Gwangju District Court on February 12, 2016, and Defendant EX was finally decided on December 23, 2016. Defendant EX was sentenced to two years of a suspended sentence of imprisonment for an injury, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on December 23, 2016 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 31, 2016.
[2017 Gohap 75] (Defendant EV, EX, and EY) Defendant EV, and Defendant EY are friendly, and Defendant EX is eV and Defendant EY’s latter part.
1. The Defendants jointly committed a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special quasi-rape) by the Defendants: (a) around 00:0 on January 1, 2014, the FGel located in the FF in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-si, called the FJ Game (if a person refers to a certain condition while returning to the Province, the person meeting such conditions would face his/her losses and drink five fingers first); (b) the victim and the above FI returned to the FKel in the vicinity of his/her lodging place; (c) the Defendants were waiting the victim to have the victim take a son and the victim take a son by drinking alcohol on the ground that 04:00 on the ground that it would be difficult for the victim to take a son and the victim to take a son, thereby waiting the victim to take a son to take a son’s son’s son and the victim to take a son’s son’s son, but the Defendants were the victim and the victim.
Defendant EX and Defendant EY agreed to create an atmosphere, and Defendant EX was to do so following Defendant EV.