beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff KRW 25,00,000 and Defendant B with respect thereto from April 22, 2015, and Defendant C with respect to the said amount.
Reasons
1. Written statement of decision on the cause of the claim: E-O.O. (25 million won, No.3 million won, No. 3 million won, and No. 22 million won) (Provided, That the mother of E-I.D. has to pay to A the creditor, the above money will be subrogated jointly and severally by the principal until May 2006, and the method of repayment will be repaid every month according to the principal's circumstances.
I will pay 20% interest per annum if it is not possible to repay by the end of May 2006.
On October 28, 2005, comprehensively taking account of the above joint and several sureties's name B address, F name C address, F name No. 1, Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and witness D's testimony, the Defendants may recognize the fact that the Defendants jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendants' mother's mother's debt to the Plaintiff, and that the Defendants prepared a performance memorandum (hereinafter "performance memorandum of this case") as follows with the Plaintiff on October 28, 2005:
According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from May 24, 2015 after the delivery of a copy of the complaint to the above Defendant from April 22, 2015, as they seek by the Plaintiff, and from May 24, 2015 after the delivery of a copy of the complaint to the said Defendant, the Defendant C is liable to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from May 24, 2015 to the day of full payment.
2. On the determination of the Defendants’ assertion, the Defendants asserted that the instant denial of performance was forged.
Where it is recognized that the seal imprinted by the seal imprinted by the document is a seal affixed to the document’s name, the authenticity of the document is presumed to be established, unless there are special circumstances, and once the authenticity of the document is presumed to be established, the authenticity of the document shall be presumed to be established in accordance with Article 358 of the Civil Procedure Act.
In addition, the authenticity of private documents must be proved.