A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. At around 02:50 on May 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the main station located in Macheon-si B that drunk guests would escape from disturbance at the main station; (b) received a request for verification of identity from the head office of the Macheon Police Station C District, and received a request for verification of identity to listen to the details of the report from D, and (c) made once the chest part of D with drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the receipt of reports by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the on-site visit.

2. As stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant said that “A police officer, a police officer, who was dispatched prior to seeed D, E, E, the background leading up to the dispatch, F, and slope G, i.e., the Defendant told the victim H, who was a police officer, that “I ambine, ambling, ambling, spath, and bitch bitch bitch,” 20 square meters.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The written statement E of the statement of the defendant concerning the defendant's legal statement Eul is the chief of the accusation, the C District service, the investigation report (on-site exit situation, etc.) - the bathing camera, the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigation report (to hear related telephone statements);

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The act of exercising violence against police officers dispatched by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act upon receiving a report of 112, and the act of taking a bath shall not obstruct the legitimate execution of duties by police officers, and the act of obstructing the performance of duties by police officers is considerably good;

However, in light of the circumstances such as the defendant's attitude against his mistake and the fact that there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, criminal records, the result of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime are considered as the order.