logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.02.06 2013고단6764
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 23, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective injury by deadly weapons, etc.) found the victim E (the above main employee) who was an employee of the above main employee to leave the son who brought to the son while drinking alcohol with the 3-4 main employees of the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu around November 2013.

Accordingly, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “sume”, and expressed the victim’s desire one time at drinking, and ice ice ice ices (name 20 cm, height 20 cm), which is a dangerous object on the customer’s own, was placed in the victim’s head, thereby causing two weeks of medical injury to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) assaulted an employee as stated in paragraph (1) at the time, place, and as stated in paragraph (1); and (b) 20 minutes of the disturbance, she saw the customer to be satisfed and satisfed with his body while satisfing him, and she saw him to go out of the play.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim F's bar business by force.

3. On November 7, 2013, at the main point of “D” as stated in Paragraph 1, around 23:40 on November 23, 2013, the Defendant expressed that he was asked by H of the seat of the Daegu Dong-dong Police Station G District, who was dispatched after having received the notification of 112, about personal information and the circumstances of the case, and assaulted by the said H, such as: (a) gu Dong-dong Police Station G District; (b) imprisoning H’s threshold; and (c) booming H by two hands.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to H, E, and F;

1. Damage photographs;

1. The G District Work Site;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and Article 2(1)3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 2(1) and 257 of the Criminal Act.

arrow