1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall have three floors of 99.52 square meters among the real property listed in the attached list;

B. Defendant C shall enter the attached list.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the entries in the evidence Nos. 1-1 to No. 4, it may be acknowledged that the facts are identical to the entries in the grounds for the claim in the attached sheet. Thus, Defendant B is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff, Defendant B is obligated to deliver the same as the entry in the attached sheet. Defendant B is the third floor of 9.52 square meters among the real estate listed in the attached sheet, Defendant C is the second floor of 9.52 square meters among the real estate listed in the attached sheet, and Defendant D is the

2. The Defendants asserted that prior performance or simultaneous performance cannot be delivered before receiving the compensation for expropriation, and the Plaintiff fulfilled it. Accordingly, according to the health class, Gap evidence Nos. 5-1 and evidence Nos. 6-4, respectively, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Regional Land Tribunal rendered a ruling of expropriation on July 27, 2018 as of September 14, 2018, and calculated 3.455,000 won as the compensation for Defendant B, 3675,000 won as the compensation for Defendant C, and 50,498,000 as the compensation for Defendant D. The Plaintiff paid the aforementioned compensation to the Defendants on September 12, 2018. Thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the compensation for losses was completed by depositing the compensation for losses under the adjudication of expropriation with the Defendants is without merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is accepted for each reason, and it is so decided as per Disposition.