logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2020.12.09 2018가합102088
하자보수금 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B and Defendant C Co., Ltd. jointly share KRW 702,534,117 and KRW 201,00.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a party. 1) The plaintiff is a Busan B apartment (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case").

2) The Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant C”) and the Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) jointly construct and sell the instant apartment, and the Defendant Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) guaranteed the Defendant Company’s obligation to repair the defects of the instant apartment.

B. 1) On November 12, 2013, the Defendant Company entered into a contract for the repair of defects and approval for the use thereof; and the Defendant Company entered into the instant apartment construction project (hereinafter “instant construction”) with the Defendant Corporation and the Defendant Company.

In the event that the obligation to repair defects is not fulfilled, the Defendant Corporation entered into a contract with the head of the Gu, which is the guarantee creditor, to pay the warranty bond within the same period and amount as specified in [Attachment 1] and received the warranty bond (hereinafter “each warranty contract of this case”).

6) From the date of inspection on the performance of the warranty period of No. 1 D (the date of December 6, 2013) 1 year from 475,202,517 E 2 E 1 year from the date of inspection on the performance of the warranty (the date of December 6, 2013) 712,803,775 G G inspection (the date of December 6, 2013) 3 years and 356,401,8875 H inspection (the date of December 6, 2013) 5 years and 356,401,875 G inspection (the date of inspection on the performance of the warranty period of No. 1 D 1D (the date of December 6, 2013) to 356,401,87,376,376,012,5832) to which the council of occupants' representatives was issued pursuant to Article 5 of the Act.

3. The apartment of this case had undergone a pre-use inspection on December 6, 2013, and thereafter, the plaintiff as the council of occupants' representatives of the apartment of this case constituted each of the instant apartment of this case.

arrow