All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative of the (ju) D Co., Ltd., of the Gyeonggi-si Building C, is an employer who runs a software consulting and supply business using two regular workers.

1. The Defendant in violation of the Labor Standards Act did not pay the total amount of KRW 17,517,490, from November 1, 2016 to July 31, 2018, to KRW 3,505,490, and wage 3,505,490, and wage 3,502,170, and wage 3,502,170, and wage 3,502,170, and wage 3,502,170, and wage 3,502,170, and total of KRW 17,517,490, and KRW 17,50,490 from June 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019; and did not pay the total amount of KRW 16,500,000, including wage 3,505,49,619,619,6319,619,619

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act: (a) the Defendant worked in the said workplace from November 1, 2016 to July 31, 2018 and did not pay KRW 9,628,614 in the aggregate of two employees, including KRW 6,69,575, and KRW 6,575, and KRW 2,959,039, which were retired from office, from June 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019; and (b) the Defendant did not pay KRW 9,628,614 within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement on the extension of the due date between the parties.

2. The judgment is the case that falls under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act and Articles 44 subparag. 1 and 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act and the proviso of Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits. According to workers E and F’s withdrawal of complaint, the above workers can be acknowledged as having expressed their wish not to punish the Defendant after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.