logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.29 2016고단8871
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of a construction company called “C”, and Defendant B is the vice-chairperson of “C”.

1. On November 2013, the Defendants at the “C” office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Officer D, and the victims E engage in “Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement at the same time.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not engage in the above business, so even if they received an investment, they did not have the intent or ability to repay the principal and the profits.

Nevertheless, on November 19, 2013, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim, thereby deceiving the victim to transfer the victim to the account under the name of the Defendant A on the part of November 19, 2013.

2. The Defendants, at the office of the above “C” on November 26, 2013, provide the victim E with a “state (state)’s non-financial management project,” and if the Defendants more invest KRW 100 million in the two-months, KRW 130 million will be provided.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement at the same time.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not engage in the above business, so even if they received an investment, they did not have the intent or ability to repay the principal and the profits.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim and then acquired 100 million won of the check from the victim to the victim, namely, the victim.

3. The Defendants, at the early December 2013 office of the Defendant’s “C” office, would give the victim E an investment of KRW 100 million in the Indonesia Resource Development Project and make two times the investment amount within the two months.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement at the same time.”

However, in fact, the Defendants did not engage in the above business, so even if they received an investment, they intend to give the shares of the Company and redeem the principal and profits of the investment.

arrow