All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. According to the records of the grounds for appeal, the court below acquitted all of the facts charged in this case, although the defendants could be found to have obstructed the disciplinary affairs of G Corporation by force in collusion with H, I or L, etc.

2. We examine the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records of this case. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the defendants delayed the operation of the disciplinary committee, but it is not sufficient to acknowledge that the defendants interfered with the disciplinary affairs of G Corporation by force in collusion with each H, I, or L as stated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the fact-finding and judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendants for this reason is just and it is not erroneous and there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as pointed out by the prosecutor in the judgment of the court below.

3. If so, the Prosecutor’s appeal against the Defendants is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is apparent that “M” in the 3rd page of the lower judgment is an error of “P”, it shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.