1. The Defendant is 15% per annum with respect to KRW 185,342,466 and KRW 550,000,000 to the Plaintiff from April 1, 2017 to the date of full payment.

1. The facts of the reasons for the application (However, ‘creditor' shall be considered as ‘Plaintiff', and ‘debtor' shall be considered as ‘Defendant') are recognized by the respective entries and arguments in A1 to 4, or by the whole purport of pleadings.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff interest and delay damages on the loan as stated in Paragraph 1 of this Article.

2. As to this, the defendant asserts that the procedure for personal bankruptcy and exemption against the defendant is in progress, but according to the whole purport of the statement of evidence No. 1 and the whole pleadings, it can be recognized that there was a decision of discontinuation of bankruptcy and non-permission of discharge (Seoul Rehabilitation Court 2014, 12782) against the defendant. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.