logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.04 2018누35515
선불식 할부거래업자 등록취소처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (including the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, but excluding the corresponding part of the conclusion, hereinafter “4. conclusion”), and therefore, they are cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. On the right side of the two modified parts, the “instant revocation of registration” was added to the “instant prior disposition” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant revocation of registration”).

2 Under the 2 pages, the phrase “this case’s legal provision” shall be added to the right side of Article 40(2)2 of the Installment Transactions Act (hereinafter referred to as “this case’s legal provision”), including the main text and proviso to paragraph (2).

2 The following shall be added to the right side of the two parallels below:

Even if it is interpreted that "a case falling under the grounds for disqualification provided for in the subparagraphs of Article 20" provided for in the legal provisions of this case does not mean "a case falling under the above grounds for disqualification at the time of the disposition," but it means a case where "a case where a cause for disqualification occurs" or "a case where a cause for disqualification occurs," in light of the principle of liability, it shall not be deemed that a case where the party cannot be expected to avoid the occurrence of the grounds for disqualification or where there is a justifiable reason for not being able to criticize the violation of the legal obligations. Thus, it is difficult to expect the plaintiff to avoid

(1) Determination on the Plaintiff’s first argument is made (A) the characteristics and current status of the first commercial operation of the legal provision of this case, which the insured agreed over a long-term period of time, and the payment is the death of the insured person or his family member.

arrow