beta
Text
1. The Defendant: 340,92,977 won for Plaintiff A, 10,000,000 won for Plaintiff B, and 5,000,000 won for Plaintiff C and D respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff A is a person engaged in the freight transport business using the FF truck, one’s own ownership (hereinafter “instant truck”). G is a driver of the Defendant Company’s logistics division (hereinafter “instant truck”).
B. At around 09:30 on January 21, 2016, G driven the instant truck at the factory end of the Defendant Company’s factory located in Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and moved the instant truck to and unloaded from the instant truck to the warehouse by driving the said truck after being loaded into the instant truck. The said cargo was repeated work of storing the said car at approximately 50 km, which is a plastic material, with approximately 50 km, and G, with the said self-concept stored two parts below.
(c) During the last loading and unloading operations, a door door is installed on both sides of the loading fleet in order to facilitate the upper part of the wing wing winging and unloading operations, and the roof itself on which the wing wing wing is being driven is also a cargo of a structure that increases.
At the time of the instant accident, the instant truck was laid down on both sides, but the wing wing string had not increased, and there was a wing wing string between the two sides of the wing wing string and the wing wing string.
When G was left behind the wind which was laid down in the roof crepan of the freight truck of this case, the plaintiff A was at the price of the plaintiff who was in the vicinity of the brush, and was at the price of the plaintiff A, who was in the vicinity of the brush, suffered from the injury of the plaintiff, such as the brush and the brush, which had been in the two bodies open to the above plaintiff.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.
At the time of the instant accident, the signal number, etc. was not separately posted at the loading and unloading place.
E. The instant accident, G and the Defendant Company Safety Manager, were charged with injury by occupational negligence.