logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.07.22 2014고단492
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Category C truck truck truck trucks.

On October 10, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at the speed of 09:25, and proceeded at the speed of 60 kilometers from the direction of the Do screen to the direction of the Do screen, along the intersection where there is no signal, etc. in front of the village in the front of the Do screen in the Yacheon-gun, Goung-gun.

At this point, there was a duty of care to make a person engaged in driving service not to overtake as an intersection, so there was a duty of care to make the person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so, and due to the negligence of being overtaken into the left-hand side of the E-wing type driven by the victim D (52 years of age), which led to the collision of the victim's left-hand door, etc.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the closure of the part of L2, which requires approximately 10 weeks of medical treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (4) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the vehicle is in conflict with the other one, the injury of the victim was inflicted, but the fact that the vehicle of the defendant was covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, the agreement between the victim and the victim is made smoothly, and the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding

arrow