The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On March 19, 2014, the Defendant appeared in the Daegu District Court No. 31, 2013 High Court Decision No. 2523, supra, and took an oath, as a witness, on the part of the Defendant, at the Daegu District Court Decision No. 31, 2013 High Court Decision No. 2523, supra.

The defendant testified to the presiding judge who is trying to examine the case that "e the case is "e the case" in the newspaper "I see whether the defendant's (C) was "at that time the defendant (C) was written with force", and testified to the purport that "I see that the defendant (C) was inside and outside of D, and I see that D's "I see that it was "I see that it was "I see that it was "I see" in the prosecutor's question "I see that it was "I see that it was her own."

However, the facts were not that D himself, but C was leading D out of the office, and the defendant was witnessed all of the above pages.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. The judgment of perjury is established when a witness who has taken an oath pursuant to the Act makes a statement contrary to his/her memory. Thus, even if such statement is inconsistent with objective facts, it cannot be readily concluded that it is perjury before examining whether it goes against the witness memory. The conviction in a criminal trial should be based on evidence with probative value sufficient for a judge to have the authenticity of the facts charged to the extent that there is no room for a reasonable doubt, and even if such proof is insufficient, it cannot be said that there is a suspicion of guilt against the witness.

Therefore, in order to recognize a witness's statement as a perjury, it is necessary to prove that the contents of the statement violate the witness's memory to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.