The punishment of the accused shall be determined by two years of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 721] The Defendant was a person who worked as the team leader at Dong Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. from January 2014 to August 2016, 2016, and was aware of the victim D with the introduction of E, insurance customer, and the victim F was aware of the victim’s introduction.

1. On January 1, 2015, the Defendant against the victim D may purchase the victim’s house of the victim D, which was located in G, with “if he makes an investment to B, he/she subscribe to the insurance product that guarantees high profit, and pay KRW 1,50,000 per month the amount of investment to the victim’s house of the victim D, which is KRW 1.5 million per month.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the profits to the victim by purchasing the insurance products that guarantee the principal because the Defendant was planning to “prohibit a return,” such as paying the Defendant’s personal debt with the money that he received from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, received KRW 1 million from the victim’s new bank account in the name of the Defendant around the 5th of the same month; (b) and (c) from around that time to March 31, 2016, he received a total of KRW 15 million in total over 45 times, as shown in attached Table 1 of the List of Crimes, from around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim and receiving the property, acquired the property.

2. On March 2015, the Defendant against the Victim F, who purchased a type of insurance product guaranteeing principal that guarantees high-profit profits if an investment is made to B, from the mutual infinite Kaf, which is located in the Young-si, Young-si, Young-si, Young-si, Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant would pay KRW 1,50,000 won per month as its profits.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, the facts revealed that the Defendant, who received money from the injured party, did not return the Defendant’s personal debt, etc., and thus, the Defendant subscribed to the insurance products that guarantee the principal of the principal and the profits therefrom.