beta
Text
1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal and selective claims in the trial are all dismissed.
2. Appeal;
Reasons
1. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act
Part 3: 10 to 13: (2) Plaintiffs, Appointors L, and M (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs, etc.”)
The division, N, andO are the owners of land, etc. who owned real estate or obstacles within the rearrangement zone in this case, and the plaintiff, etc., N, andO did not apply for parcelling-out in opposition to the establishment of the non-party partnership.
Meanwhile, in accordance with the agreement on the division of inherited property with P, Q, R, and S, who is another co-inheritors in inheritance commenced on September 1, 2013 by N, the Selection decided to inherit the entire claim for the expropriation compensation against the non-party partnership recognized in the following relevant cases filed by N against the Daejeon Metropolitan City Land Tribunal and the non-party partnership. The Selection M is a sole heir in inheritance commenced on October 14, 2013 by theO.
The term “Plaintiffs, etc.” under the third page 5 and 4 below shall be read as “Plaintiffs, etc., N, andO.”
On November 5, 2014, the Daejeon District Court partially accepted the claim against the plaintiff et al., N, and O on November 5, 2014 (However, the claim for compensation under Article 42 of the Land Compensation Act was all dismissed.
(1) The court rendered a judgment that rendered a decision, and the non-party union filed an appeal (the plaintiff, etc., N, andO) as the court 2014Nu654, and the court rendered a judgment that partially accepted the appeal of the non-party union and the incidental appeal of the plaintiff, etc., N, andO on December 24, 2015, and the non-party union, the plaintiff, etc., N, andO were Supreme Court Decision 2016Du247.