logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.13 2015고단5919
강제추행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 22, 2015, the Defendant was forced to commit an indecent act, following the D convenience store located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, and after being reported at the parking lot, sent to the 112 report and during the investigation, the Defendant called “AC” to the victim (Vin, 27 years of age) of the Incheon Seo-gu Police Station E-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, which was called “AC” and used the victim’s hand as follows. The Defendant was removed from the police officer of the same fee, and “it is not necessary to do so.”

“In the second hand, the victim et al. was rhyd with the victim et al. as follows and indecent act.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at around 22:20 on the same day, and at around 112:20 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) threatened a police officer of the Incheon Western Police Station E District Police Station, who was called up with 112, with the report, to listen to the statements of a person on the spot; (b) forced a police officer to have a defective driver’s seat to move the patrol vehicle to communicate the vehicle; and (c) interfered with a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reports and investigation by assaulting the F to have the said F’s chest pushed down at hand and walk up the f’s chest on his/her hand, and walk up to the right side, by assaulting the police officer to interfere with the police officer’s duty of reporting and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the recognition of the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. The legal statement of a witness and H;

1. The statement of the police with F (the defendant and his defense counsel at the time were satisfy, so the situation is not well memory.

While denying a crime with the purport that there was no intention to commit an indecent act without using the victim’s parts such as the victim, etc., the victim has consistently and specifically stated the type and circumstances of the crime committed by the defendant with the investigative agency and the court as stated in the crime, and there is no circumstance that there is no suspicion of false statement.

In particular, the part concerning the main words of the defendant and the victim's legal statements is the defendant's side.

arrow