logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2015.01.09 2014가합517
매매대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. As to the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached list No. C and each real estate listed in the attached list No. 2 through (5) of the attached list No. 4 owned by C (hereinafter referred to as “the instant real estate” in the attached list No. 1; when the real estate listed in the attached list No. 2 through No. 5 is referred to as “the title of the instant real estate,” and when the whole title is referred to as “each of the instant real estate,” the transfer registration for ownership was completed on December 28, 2007 under the Plaintiff’s name as of December 24, 2007; and ② the provisional registration for the right to claim transfer of ownership was completed on February 16, 2009 under the Defendant’s name as of July 8, 2010 under the Defendant’s name as of June 18, 2010 (hereinafter “the ownership transfer registration”).

B. As to the instant real estate Nos. 1, 4, and 5, the registration of creation of a mortgage was completed on May 10, 200 with the maximum debt amount of KRW 500 million, the livestock cooperative of the person holding the right to collateral security, the debtor D, and on July 31, 2002, the registration of creation of a mortgage was completed on the instant real estate Nos. 2 and 3 as additional security was completed on the ground of additional contract regarding the instant real estate Nos. 2 and 3.

(B) On December 28, 2007, the registration of change of the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security”) was made to change the debtor of the instant right to collateral security from D to the Plaintiff on the ground that the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security”) and the registration of change of the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security”) that changed the debtor of the instant right to collateral security (hereinafter “the right to collateral security”) from the Plaintiff was made on November 25, 201

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Entry of Gap evidence 1 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff purchased each of the instant real estate from C, E, and D on the condition that the Plaintiff acquired the instant collateral security and paid KRW 148.6 million in the purchase price.

The defendant of this case.

arrow