1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Name 1 of the patented invention in this case: B. 2)/registration date/E. 3: Plaintiff 4) 【 Claim No. 1’s polypropy strings of 2-3§¯, and B.M. 1’s e.g. M. m. m. m. 2/m. m. m. m. 3’s m. m. m. m. 3’s m. m. m. m. 2’s m. m. m. 3’s m. m. m. m. 2’s m. m. m. 1’s m. m. m. 3’s m. m. m. m. m. 2’s m. m. m. m. m. 1’s m. m. m. m. m. m. 3’s m. m. m. m. m. 2’t. m. m.

2) Cited Invention 2 is related to the “vested Invention 2” published on March 24, 2006 by Korea-registered Patent Gazette No. 562856, published on March 24, 2006. C. The Defendant, on February 7, 2014, filed against the Plaintiff on the Intellectual Property Tribunal, the instant patent invention is identical to the cited Invention 1, and is not new, or is readily recognizable by a person with ordinary knowledge in the art to which the invention pertains (hereinafter “ordinary technician”) from the cited Invention 1, 2, etc., and thus, the nonobviousness should be invalidated pursuant to Article 29(1) or (2) of the Patent Act.