logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.06 2018가단5092314
대여금등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B is jointly and severally with C, and (1) within the scope of KRW 130,00,000,000, as well as KRW 79,102,873.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(However, the creditor is deemed to be the "Plaintiff" and the debtor C is deemed to be the "Defendant", and the debtor C's portion was not the case where the payment order was finalized on February 14, 2018 in the case of loans, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court 2018Hu4559.

2. Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 208(3)2, 150(3), and 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (a) (i.e., the Defendants only submitted a formal written objection that does not dispute the Plaintiff’s dismissal of claim or the fact of claim after being served with the original copy of the instant payment order. Since they were absent on the date of pleading without complying with the recommendation to submit a substantial response without submitting a subsequent written response, they shall be deemed to have led to the confession of all the Plaintiff’s assertion in accordance with Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow