logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.10.30 2012고단4875
절도등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one month for a crime set forth in Article 1 of the judgment of the defendant, and by imprisonment for two months for a crime set forth in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on December 21, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2012.

1. On August 9, 2012, from around 20:00 to 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant, while taking directors within the three pages of the Defendant, who had been under the building C of Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon, from around 20:0 to around 21:00 on August 9, 2012, the Defendant got off and stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 300,000 at the market price of the victim D, the owner of the house, using the gaps in which surveillance was neglected.

2. On May 20, 2013, around 17:34, the Defendant sought a pet dog from “G” store in the Jung-gu Daejeon E victim FF, Daejeon, Daejeon, with a gap where the victim’s surveillance was neglected, the Defendant placed the victim’s surveillance in a provisional room that prepared one marith of the market price of KRW 2,500,000, which was kept in the above virtual display stand, and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. Contract for the studio lease;

1. On-site and CCTV photographs;

1. Previous records: Application of investigation reports (a copy of judgment, and each bound copy of indictment) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. In the case of larceny 2 of Article 37 of the Criminal Procedure Act (the first head of the judgment that became final and conclusive and the first head of larceny, etc.), the crime committed during the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime, although the victim agreed to the punishment of larceny 2 of the judgment on the grounds of sentencing, it is a crime committed during the suspension period of execution due to the same crime. In the case of larceny 1 of the judgment, the latter concurrent crimes are committed. The defendant deposited 30,000 won for the victim, taking into account the following factors: the defendant's age, character, character, family environment, criminal record relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, damage amount, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence against the defendant

arrow