Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 21, 2014, B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) entered into a subcontract for construction with Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) on the condition that B subcontracted the pipeline construction (hereinafter “instant pipeline construction”) from among the plant construction works in Ansan C Co., Ltd. located in the Defendant Company, and that Defendant Company completed the said pipeline construction works and paid the price by July 31, 2015. On July 31, 2015, B entered into an agreement with the Defendant Company to pay KRW 4,004,280,932 (including value-added tax) (including value-added tax) by increasing the price of the said pipeline construction works.
(see Evidence 1, 2). (b)
The Plaintiff: (a) was a person operating a “D” company with the Defendant Company’s office to send its seal to the construction site; and (b) supplied the non-official map and page-authorized figures at the site of the pipeline construction from December 2014 to the site of the instant pipeline construction; and (c) had the Defendant Company perform the construction work in accordance with the Defendant Company’s work order.
(see Evidence A, 4, 11). (c)
The piping Corporation was completed on July 31, 2015.
【Reason for Recognition】 Each description of evidence Nos. 4 and 11 (if there are more than one number, including the number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleading
2. The plaintiff's assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s wage, as a result of the instant pipeline construction site, had the Plaintiff conduct construction in the middle order from December 2, 2014 to June 2015. Of them, KRW 21,175,000 in total value-added tax amounting to KRW 19,250,00,00 equivalent to May 2015, should be paid from the Defendant Company.
B. The Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant Company under which the Plaintiff would have prevented steel plates from construction at the site of the instant pipeline construction, and receive KRW 2,200,000 (including value-added tax) from the Defendant Company. The Plaintiff completed the construction work for preventing steel plates.
C. The plaintiff is paid by the defendant according to the amount of money to be paid by the defendant.