Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On October 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on May 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime at the same court on May 29, 2014, and on December 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at least twice due to the same crime in the same court on December 28, 20
[2] On September 2, 2017, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle on September 2, 2017, driven a motor vehicle at Criri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Report on the circumstances of driving without a license;
1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;
1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;
1. The driver's license ledger;
1. Each photograph;
1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, application of investigation reports (report on confirmation of the same criminal suspect's records)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 (the following favorable circumstances): The defendant who has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, but has committed the crime of this case even though he was under the suspended sentence of imprisonment for the same crime (the period of the suspended sentence is invalid or revoked).