The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (1,000,000 won) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant’s mistake is recognized and the Defendant’s economic condition is not good, the instant crime is likely to operate a vehicle without mandatory insurance. In particular, the Defendant committed on June 15, 2013 while driving the vehicle without mandatory insurance on December 16, 2012 and continuously driving the said vehicle, and the nature of the crime is bad; the Defendant committed several offenses violating traffic laws and regulations, and there was a history of punishment for the same type of crime only once, taking into account the circumstances after the commission of the crime, Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, family relationship, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the instant records and arguments, and thus, the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Provided, That according to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure Article 25 (1) of the Rules on the Criminal Procedure, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with the above

1. The relevant legal provisions and the selected portion of punishment regarding the crime are corrected as “the operation of a vehicle which was not mandatory insurance (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012) of the former Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Jul. 13, 2012); each of the former Guarantee of Automobile Compensation (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015); and each of the former Guarantee of Automobile Compensation (amended by Act No. 12987, Aug. 24, 2012).”