logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.09.22 2016고단936
배임증재
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for ten months, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On September 4, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October 10, 2014 by the Incheon District Court for the re-violation of breach of trust, etc. and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2014.

Defendant

C On December 12, 2014, the Seoul High Court sentenced 1 year of suspended sentence to 2 years of imprisonment due to the re-violation of breach of trust at the Seoul High Court on December 12, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 20, 2014.

[Criminal facts] Defendant C is a staff member of a high water company, Defendant A is a person engaged in the management of the skin center in the apartment complex E, and Defendant B is a person who operates “F”.

Defendant

C A around March 2013, 2013, from H elected as the Dong representative of G apartment 503 Dong-dong, “There is insufficient money to move into an apartment.”

Whether or not to lend money or not;

“I may assist Ha in the process of selecting an entity operating the Nitice Center in a harsh manner.”

If you help, I would like to provide money by talking about the related company.

“To assist in making proposals”

The promise was received, and the purport was delivered to Defendant A and B, and the L was offered to grant KRW 30 million for the street funds to H, and it was recruited to receive the successful bid from the Eitice Center, which was directly operated by G apartment.

Accordingly, Defendant A borrowed from Defendant B.

The defendant B repaid the above KRW 30 million to the defendant C, and the defendant B had I know of that fact deliver the above KRW 30 million to the defendant C along with the defendant A.

Defendant

C On April 2013, at the “K” restaurant located in the jurisdiction of the Hamju-si, Hamju-si, Hamju, the Defendant B made an illegal solicitation to the effect that the information on the tender documentation, bid eligibility conditions, etc. should be informed in advance during the selection procedure of the external operating company of the said apartment Hamnita Center, and that the Defendant B would be selected as the operating company, and that KRW 30 million received from the Defendant B was delivered to H.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with G apartment.

arrow