The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (6 months of imprisonment and 80 hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is against the defendant's recognition of the crime, and the facts that the court below agreed with the other party to the act of obscenity or the victim of a forced indecent act in the performance are favorable to the defendant.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the crime of this case was committed against a female woman, for which three months have not yet passed since the suspended sentence was sentenced due to the same crime and the judgment became final and conclusive; (b) the nature of the crime was poor; and (c) other various conditions of sentencing as indicated in the record, such as the applicable law of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the defendant, sexual conduct, and environment, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.