All the judgment below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

1. The gist of the prosecutor’s appeal (unfair sentencing) is as follows: (a) the crime of this case committed by the Defendants, in light of the following: (b) the Defendants, first of all, proposed sexual traffic to F, arrange to engage in sexual traffic with male and female people in 100 persons; (c) the nature of the crime is very difficult to view; (d) the Defendants do not seriously reflect the mistakes; and (e) the risk of recidivism is high; and (e) the lower court’s sentence ordering Defendant A to order to complete sexual assault treatment programs for a fine of KRW 15 million and KRW 12 million and KRW 40,000,000 for each of the above 40 hours is unreasonable.

2. The Defendants committed each of the crimes of this case in collusion with G to allow them to engage in sexual traffic, thereby distributing profits therefrom to the F (the age of 17) and posting a letter of advertising as if they were F himself/herself through smartphone hosting, and it is not good to commit each of the crimes of this case. The Defendants committed each of the crimes of this case in a systematic and planned manner, and used the profits from the crime of this case to F for their own living costs, entertainment expenses, etc.; the physical and mental suffering from the crimes of this case seems to be serious; Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the government district court on May 24, 2015 for six years, and asked them to purchase sex from F; Defendant A committed each of the crimes of this case, including the following facts and circumstances, and the motive and circumstances of the crime of this case; Defendant A committed each of the above crimes of this case; Defendant A committed the crime of this case during the suspended execution period of six years; Defendant A committed each of the above crimes of this case; Defendant’s motive and circumstances.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed and the pleading is made in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.