beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, from February 2012, who had been working in the D cafeteria located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was operated by the victim B from February 2, 2012, demanded the victim to be hedging while serving together with the victim in an internal relationship with the victim;
A. A. Around September 10, 2013, the Defendant heard the victim’s phrase “I wish to return to a home” from the victim in the vicinity of Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, stating that “I will have a detailed statement of revenue and expenditure of the above restaurant. I reported to the tax office. I would like to know the parent’s thickness. I would like to know the parent’s thickness, and threaten the victim at the place of the mother of his/her family.”
B. On November 27, 2013, the Defendant sent a note to the victim through the Kakao Stockholm, a mobile phone fluor, on the ground that the victim was not fluoring on the doping, and on the ground that the victim was not fluoring. It is not difficult for the victim to die. When avoiding the relationship and refusing to do so, the Defendant has prepared for her to die. At this moment, the Defendant has been influenced with the ta, knife, kniff, and scarf, and scarf, to the effect that “I will not die if you wait for only face before her death.” On the other hand, the Defendant threatened the victim by continuously transmitting a message to the effect that “I will flue E if you are not fluoring on the face.”
C. The Defendant Naman on December 2, 2013
In the same way, the victim sent to the victim a note to the effect that “I wish to die. However, I want to die. I wish to do so. I want to cause her to feel a fluorous pain,” and “I wish to present a fluorous fluor, such as a fluor, good, and waste. I now know to the family members of the Party. I threatened the victim.”
Around January 22, 2014, the Defendant, by the foregoing method, killed the victim as the head of “the victim.”