logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.03.19 2019고단367
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On May 12, 2003, around 14:05, the Defendant violated the restriction on vehicle operation by the road management authority with respect to the company’s business by having the driver B, who was affiliated with the charges, operate more than 1.22 tons of a 3 livestock out of 10 tons of a 3 livestock shed at the entrance of a place of origin company and a 10.22 tons of a 3 livestock shed at the 200-2 Sinsan-si.

2. However, the penal provisions of the Road Act applied to the defendant among the applicable provisions of the facts charged in this case have lost its effect retroactively according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow