Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) (23 years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination:

A. It is recognized that the part of the defendant's case committed the crime of this case when the defendant was in a trial, and the circumstances such as the confession of the crime of this case and his mistake is pened in depth, and the fact that he should support the higher children of Grade I intellectual disability.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant with life insurance with the victim and the beneficiary as the beneficiary in order to be paid the death insurance, and murdering the victim's clothes once. The crime of this case resulted in harsh results by the defendant's murdering the victim's lives with high dignity and dignity. The defendant intentionally accessed the victim with a living-site life insurance to receive a large amount of death insurance, and murdered after taking the victim's life insurance, and there is a reason to criticize in particular in the motive of the crime. The crime of this case is extremely poor even in the aspect of the criminal law. The defendant prior to the crime of this case, he designated the victim as the beneficiary with his own life insurance, designated him as the beneficiary with excessive appearance of the crime as the beneficiary, put his own smartphone into the front door of his own car in advance. The defendant prepared for the crime of this case with his own smartphone to search for the victim's knife and to prepare for the crime of this case from time to time to time.