logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.08.17 2015가단15674
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) B: (a) KRW 20,000,000 against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from July 11, 2015 to August 17, 2016.

Reasons

1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to exist;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who served as the representative director of “D” (hereinafter “D”), a company for the purpose of manufacturing and selling security devices, etc., and resigned on December 15, 2014. From October 10, 2014, the Plaintiff served as the representative director of “E” (hereinafter “E”) for a company for the purpose of manufacturing and selling security devices.

Defendant B is the representative director of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), a company for the purpose of manufacturing and selling luminous (CCTV), and Defendant C is the F Co., Ltd.’s internal director and E’s internal director, as Defendant B’s children.

B. At the time of its establishment on November 8, 2013, E promoted a project mainly for the development of black boxes pursuant to the F and the Business Agreement, as a company operated by Defendant C, its wife, such as that Defendant C, its 40%, G (Defendant C’s partner’s partner), 50%, the representative director H 10% shares, and Defendant C, its wife and I are listed as inside directors and auditors.

In other words, E has developed and produced black boxes through collaborative companies, and F has established strategic alliances in which F is responsible for commercialization and marketing for the sale of the product, and has promoted the project in a way that distributes profits from the sale of the product.

C. On June 2014, the Plaintiff began to be engaged in the business of E from June 2014 with the Defendants, and around October 2014, the Plaintiff was appointed as the representative director of E and acquired the entire shares of H.

However, the difference between the Plaintiff and the Defendants regarding the operation of E is exposed, and the infertility occurred, and E has become a business suspension status due to the retirement of employees and the shortage of operating funds from March 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-4, 7, 9, 10 evidence, and .

arrow