logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.11.25 2020고정530
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bran vehicle.

1. Around 04:05 on April 14, 2020, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.113% in blood alcohol concentration at 0.13% in front of the D main point located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul, with a distance of about 5 kilometers from the d main point of view to the front day of the original gular road of the same Gu.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) run a four-lane way in front of the Ulsan Airport located in the intersection of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan by driving the above vehicle on a temporary warning under paragraph (1) and drive it one-lane from the distance of service to the distance of original Triri

A two-lane change.

In this case, as a driver of a motor vehicle, he/she has a duty of care to maintain a clear mental state at all times and properly manipulate the steering direction and brake system to prevent shocking accidents with objects.

Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in driving the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol and driving it into one-lane.

The victim E (the age of 28) who proceeded into two lanes due to the driver's negligence and was driven by the victim E (the age of 28) on the right side of the vehicle that was driven by the driver's negligence, received the right side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim E and the victim G (persons aged 28) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle by the above occupational negligence in each of the above two-day medical treatment, and at the same time, the Defendant did not immediately stop the damaged vehicle repair cost, and escape without taking measures such as providing relief to the victims, even though the Defendant damaged other’s property, such as repair cost, 3,279,269 won, such as replacement of the damaged vehicle repair cost, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. As to the defendant's partial statement E and G, respectively.

arrow