logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.09.26 2013고정208
사문서위조등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On October 17, 2012, a person who was sentenced to imprisonment for six months with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively weapons, etc.) at the Chuncheon District Court on October 17, 2012 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on

Defendant A, around February 22, 2012, agreed to acquire 10,500 common shares and the right of management of the E company from D from February 22, 2012, and assumed office as the representative director of the said company from May 10, 2012, and actually operated the said company from May 10, 2012. Defendant B, as Defendant A’s partner, is a person who actually operated the said company with Defendant A from May 10, 2012.

The Defendants were notified of the termination of the contract from D around May 7, 2012 in violation of the terms and conditions of the contract for transfer and acquisition of management rights, such as arbitrarily changing corporate sense, and upon dismissal of Defendant A from the representative director on September 1, 2012, the Defendants had arbitrarily prepared documents as if the temporary general meeting of shareholders was held, and had the Defendant A re-registered as the representative director.

1. On September 10, 2012, the Defendants: (a) conspired to hold a temporary general meeting of shareholders in the G Certified Judicial Scriveners Office F of Gangseocheon-gun, Gangwon-do; and (b) notwithstanding that there was no consent from D with respect to holding a temporary general meeting of shareholders without a notice of shareholders; (c) the Defendants, as the shareholders of the said G, consented without objection to holding a temporary general meeting of shareholders for the same decision-making as indicated in the separate general meeting of shareholders as indicated in the separate general meeting of shareholders; and (d) held a temporary general meeting of shareholders without a notice of shareholders under Article 363(5) of the Commercial Act; and (e) stated at the bottom, “shareholders D” on September 10, 2012; and (e) forged a copy of D’s name, which is a private document related to fact-finding, with the intention of exercising its authority, with the intention of attaching seals assembled by the said certified judicial office on the name of D.

2...

arrow