logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.08.21 2020나2004285
해고무효확인
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part of the claim for nullification of dismissal against the defendant shall be revoked, and this part of the lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows the evidence submitted in this court, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified.

The reasoning for this Court’s entry is as follows, excluding either cutting, deleting, or adding as follows, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. As such, this Court cited the foregoing as a summary under the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. In the part to be rewritten, deleted, or added, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance “1. Basic Facts” in Section B of the judgment of the court of first instance, “Defendant School Foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant School Foundation”) and not more than Section 6.1”, “In all,” and “In all,” the part “.”

In part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “1. Basic Facts”, “The head of the Defendant Chigh School (hereinafter “the principal of the Defendant”)” and “the principal of the Defendant and the principal of the Defendant” below and lower than the four-dimensional boxes, all of the parts “the co-defendants of the first instance court” are written.

From No. 4 of the judgment of the first instance, all of the defendants " shall be appointed to "the defendant".

In the first instance judgment, the part of the 5th to the last action shall be deleted “3. Determination on the principal’s defense against the principal of the defendant.”

(As seen earlier, the Plaintiff withdrawn the appeal against the co-defendant in the first instance trial). On the 6th judgment of the first instance, the following details are added between the first and the second instances.

“A. We examine the validity of the part of the instant lawsuit, ex officio, as to the claim for nullification of dismissal, among the instant lawsuits, with a view to recovering the original status based on a labor contract relationship or eliminating any danger or apprehension that exists in other rights or legal status due to dismissal.

arrow