logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.31 2015고단8054
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On September 23, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for occupational embezzlement at the Suwon Friwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 1 of the same year.

[2] The Defendant, as the representative director of D Co., Ltd. from March 10, 2006 to May 7, 2013, was in charge of general management of the company. The Defendant, as the representative director, was in charge of general management of the company.

3. 5. A person who served as a representative director of E Co., Ltd. from around May.

In light of the fact that the Defendant concurrently holds office as the representative director of each of the above companies, as if the respective understanding was normally concluded between the two companies, each of the above understanding is forged, and accordingly, the Defendant believed that the D Co., Ltd. should pay service fees to E Co., Ltd., and was willing to embezzled the funds of D Co., Ltd. as stated above as punishment for occupational embezzlement.

1. On July 1, 201, the Defendant of the forgery of a private document agrees on the following provisions related to the progress of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “A”) and E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “B”) under the title “Written Understanding” by means of a computer on a paper A4, with respect to the F pro rata (F; hereinafter referred to as “this project”).

“After preparing the content first, the details of “Article 1 (Provision of Services by Proxy)” and “Article 2 (Settlement of Remuneration for Services)” under that subparagraph shall be recorded, respectively, and the date of preparation shall be retrospectively prepared on March 15, 2006 by “G”, a U.S., as the representative director of the E Company, who was employed by the E Company, as the representative director of the E Company, and shall be kept in advance on the name of the E Company Representative Director G.

The seal of the E-company was affixed arbitrarily.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the understanding in the name of “Y representative Director G”, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant holding the above investigation documents is the Seoul Central District Court located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, around October 18, 2013 and around May 13, 2014, and the Seoul Central District Court, a related civil litigation.

arrow